MRI Features for Differentiation of Meningioma DNA Methylation Groups

American Journal of Neuroradiology

Theresa J. Yu, Tracy Luks, Evan Calabrese, Abrar Choudhury, William C. Chen, Michael W. McDermott, Stephen T. Magill, David R. Raleigh and Javier E. Villanueva-Meyer

Journal cover

Summary

BACKGROUND: DNA methylation profiling is a predictor of meningioma behavior and outcomes. We aimed to identify qualitative and quantitative MRI features to distinguish between three meningioma methylation groups: Merlin-intact, Immune-enriched, and Hypermitotic, each with distinct clinical outcomes, biologic features, and therapeutic vulnerabilities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preoperative MRIs were retrospectively analyzed in meningiomas with previous DNA methylation profiling. Pearson’s Chi-square, Fisher exact, and ANOVA tests were used to compare features between the three groups. ROC AUCs were used to assess the accuracy in discriminating between groups.

RESULTS: 165 patients (54 years ± 14 SD; 58 men) were analyzed. 60 meningiomas were Merlin-intact, 55 Immune-enriched, and 50 Hypermitotic. Qualitative reduced diffusion (p< .001), nADC (p< .001), T2WI signal intensity (p= .02), T1 CE volume (p<.005), and tumor site (p<.001) varied between the groups. Merlin-intact meningiomas had higher T2WI signal intensity than Immune-enriched tumors (1.97 ± 0.98 vs 1.63 ± 0.45, p= .04). Hypermitotic meningiomas had the highest proportion of tumors with qualitative reduced diffusion (67%) and lowest nADC values (1.07 ± 0.14) compared to Merlin-intact (18%, p< .001; 1.41 ± 0.30, p< .001) and Immune-enriched (31%, p= .02; 1.29 ± 0.29, p= .002) meningiomas. The presence of qualitative reduced diffusion (AUC 0.71, p= .001) and lower nADC (AUC 0.82, p< .001) were able to predict Hypermitotic meningiomas. Merlin-intact tumors were predicted by the absence of qualitative reduced diffusion (AUC 0.66, p= 0.01), higher nADC (AUC 0.74, p< .001), and higher T2WI signal intensity (AUC 0.64, p= .047). Hypermitotic tumors (64.3 cm3 ± 49.1) had larger T1CE volumes than Merlin-intact (42.5 cm3 ± 37.9, p= .02) and Immune-enriched (38.2 cm3 ± 37.7, p=<.002) tumors, with tumor size a predictor of Hypermitotic (AUC 0.65, p=.003) and Immune-enriched (AUC 0.62, p=.02) meningiomas. Merlin-intact tumors were predicted by presence at the skull base (AUC 0.67, p<.001) while Immune-enriched tumors were predicted by location outside of the skull base (AUC 0.61; 95% CI 0.70, 0.52, p= .02).

CONCLUSIONS: MR imaging has the potential to discriminate between different molecular groups of meningioma and to serve as a surrogate non-invasive marker of tumor behavior.

Citation

Theresa, J. Yu, et al. “MRI Features for Differentiation of Meningioma DNA Methylation Groups.” American Journal of Neuroradiology (2026).

BibTex

@article{theresa2026mri, title={MRI Features for Differentiation of Meningioma DNA Methylation Groups}, author={Theresa, J Yu and Luks, Tracy and Calabrese, Evan and Choudhury, Abrar and Chen, William C and McDermott, Michael W and Magill, Stephen T and Raleigh, David R and Villanueva-Meyer, Javier E}, journal={American Journal of Neuroradiology}, year={2026}, publisher={American Journal of Neuroradiology} }

Collaborators:

Referenced Research: